Design government program

A program design is also the plan of action that results from that process. Ideally, the plan is developed to the point that others can implement the program in the same way and consistently achieve its purpose. The more energy, creativity, and hard work that goes into program design, the greater the chances that a program will succeed.

Program evaluation is an organized effort to understand how effective a program is and how it can be made more effective. It can be undertaken in a formative manner that supports the program design processes. Or it can be undertaken in a summative manner that measures the effectiveness of a design as implemented in a given context. Typically, program evaluation shifts from formative to summative, and from informal to rigorous, as the program design process advances. Thanks for this blog!

I work for a non profit organization and we are about to take inventory on our overall program effectiveness. Some people call one-off efforts projects and ongoing efforts programs. Others use the two words to mean the same thing. Still others use program to mean the large-scale efforts of governments and projects to be local implementations of those larger programs.

Very confusing. My definition is broad in an effort to avoid that confusion. Perhaps it is unavoidable? You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account.

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. Skip to content. Treasury Investor Data. Debt Management Research. Cash and Debt Forecasting. Debt Limit. Financial Stability Oversight Council. Federal Insurance Office. Consolidated Sanctions List. Additional Sanctions Lists. Sanctions Programs and Country Information. Frequently Asked Questions. Contact OFAC. Financial Literacy and Education Commission. Innovations in Financial Services.

Featured Research. Exchange Stabilization Fund. International Monetary Fund. Multilateral Development Banks. Exchange Rate Analysis. Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization. Small Business Lending Fund. State Small Business Credit Initiative. Daily Treasury Bill Rates. Daily Treasury Long-Term Rates. Monthly Treasury Statement. Daily Treasury Statement. National Debt to the Penny. Most Recent Documents. S International Portfolio Investment Statistics. Release Dates.

Forms and Instructions. Report Scam Attempts. Report Fraud Related to Government Contracts. Direct Express Card. Non-Benefit Federal Payments. Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act.

Bank Secrecy Act - Fincen and more. Historic Treasury Building. Weekly Public Schedule Archive. Media Advisories Archive. Subscribe to Press Releases. Grantees should make decisions about their program based of the intersection of these different factors:. Grantees are expected to provide the service of rental assistance to tenants and landlords. This includes government, beneficiaries, other NGOs, and even key individuals in the target communities.

Then have a meeting with each of the stakeholders, either together or separately. By the end of the meetings you should be able to answer the following questions about each stakeholder you can record the answers in a table :.

As part of the design process you also need to consider what your own organisations and team are capable of doing. What resources do you have available? What skills does the team currently have? One tool that some people like to use for this step is a SWOT analysis , which identifies the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats to an organisation.

While this tool can be useful, it is by no means mandatory for conducting this step. Often a frank discussion with all members of the team is enough to identify the resources and skills available for running the program. This is one of the most critical steps, and is also the one most often missed. You are probably not the first organisation to try and address the problem you are working on.

There are several websites and databases where you can find the results of these previous programs. This will help you find out if a particular approach is likely to work before you waste money trying it.

At this stage you should also see if there are any existing Theories of Change related to your problem. A Theory of Change identifies all the possible pathways that might lead to change, and why they lead to change.

Having a good Theory of Change that is based on previous research can be very helpful in identifying possible goals and interventions, which is the next step. You could have just one goal, or you could have one goal plus several sub-objectives or outcomes.

One way to identify the goal and possible objectives is simply to reverse the statements in your problem tree from negative statements to positive ones. An example of this is shown below. This example was created by reversing the statements in the previous problem tree. Another way to identify possible goals and objectives is to look at the Theory of Change.

This can help you identify which changes would be necessary in order to have an impact on the problem. At this point you also need to decide how you will measure progress towards the goal and objectives.